Case story

  • Sri Lanka

CAO Case -Sri Lanka / Rainforest Ecolodge Linkages-01 / Deniyaya

Save the Sinharaja Campaign Complaint Regarding Rainforest Ecolodge Company (REC), Sri Lanka 2009

This case story originates from BASESwiki.org, a platform based on wiki style contributions from a virtual network or individuals, companies and organizations with relevant expertise. Though some of the information may be outdated or inaccurate due to the wiki-nature of the BASESwiki platform, they still present a valuable resource. ACCESS is reviewing and updating all BASESwiki case stories. 

Story

Located close to the Sinharaja Rainforest in southern Sri Lanka, the Rainforest Ecolodge is a joint venture eco-tourism project set up by several private sector companies in the tourism industry. IFC, through its South Asia Enterprise Development Facility (SEDF), is providing technical advisory services to the project to obtain US Green Building Certification, and promote eco-tourism in the country.

In August 2009, a local NGO - Save the Sinharaja Campaign - filed a complaint with the CAO on behalf of residents of the Deniyaya Village in Sri Lanka. The complainants raise concerns about how the project benefits local communities living in and around the area. The complaint also raises environmental concerns, including felling of trees within the 1.6 kilometer prohibition zone and dammin of a river tributary which the complainants believe threatens the rich biodiversity of the Sinharaja Rainforest - a UNESCO World Heritage Site.


CAO Action

CAO Ombudsman conducted a field assessment in October 2009 and discussed the claimant's issues with local stakeholders. The company, IFC, and the claimant have accepted all of the recommendations of CAO's Assessment report, which include: public disclosure of environmental permits and impact assessments; a dialogue with government, IUCN and UNESCO to promote demarcation of the forest boundary; and preparation of a locally-owned community development plan. In addition, IFC accepted recommendations to improve consideration of social and environmental risks on Advisory Services projects.


Outcome

This case has reached full settlement with a remaining commitment for monitoring and supervision by both IFC and CAO to ensure that recommendations are implemented.

References

CAO case story page: http://www.cao-ombudsman.org/cases/case_detail.aspx?id=151 

Contributor(s): This article was modified by Nicolaclayre (3), Pic1 (2), and Kyle (1).