Case story

  • Germany

OECD NCP Germany - Greenpeace vs. TotalFinaElf

Siberia 2003

This case story originates from, a platform based on wiki style contributions from a virtual network or individuals, companies and organizations with relevant expertise. Though some of the information may be outdated or inaccurate due to the wiki-nature of the BASESwiki platform, they still present a valuable resource. ACCESS is reviewing and updating all BASESwiki case stories. 


The complaint alleged that TotalFinaElf and its Russian suppliers had committed environmental crimes. The Complainants maintained that oil production in Russia violated German water pollution laws, and that by sourcing from Russian suppliers, TotalFinaElf was complicit the environmental destruction.

Greenpeace contended that TotalFinaElf’s headquarters in Berlin was at fault, because it made the business decisions. In addition, Russian crude was delivered to the Leuna refinery in Germany.

The complaint also asked the German NCP to investigate leaking oil pipelines and the clean up of the tundra and taiga in Siberia, which is contaminated with oil.


Although the NCP held several meetings Greenpeace and TotalFinaElf, the case was rejected in May 2003 due to the lack of an investment nexus.


OECD Watch case story page:

Contributor(s): This article was modified by Nicolaclayre (3), Kyle (2), (1), and Ejfturnbull (1).